Your Responses To The Mayoral Debate

You heard what they had to say. Now tell them what you want them to hear.

Did Sunday’s Mayoral debate on Citytv and CP24 help you make up your mind about who to vote for on November 13 th?

And who do you think won? Here are just a few of your responses to the political policy palaver.


You will notice that David Miller did not bring up the issue of transit. That is because he has no solutions to that problem. He talks of motherhood and apple pie, but the reality is that the baby was thrown out with the dishwater and the apple pie is worm infested. The city is not safer, not cleaner and not better run than three years ago.

Joel L. Rubinovich


Let’s face it – the bottom line is our property taxes are far too high.   Will any of the candidates consider a long-term plan to actually REDUCE our property taxes, considering spending has increased at city hall by over 1 billion dollars over the last 3 years?  

Will Anderson


Is it possible for 3 so called professional public figures to respond respectfully and in turn without a screaming match ensuing? It is disgraceful.

And furthermore it might actually be nice to have a candidate actually respond and not evade the questions!

Mandy Bergman


How can Mayor Miller say that our streets are safer then 3 years ago? Doesn’t he remember last summer? “The summer of the gun?” I am sorry but the city is not safer and it is not cleaner.
 
Charity
 

 
Mayor Miller likes to play the blame game. When something goes wrong he blames everyone except himself and when something might go well he takes all the credit. In Miller’s “Year of the Gun,” he blamed (Former Ontario Premier) Mike Harris and the Americans.  In this year, Miller’s “Year of the Knife,” who does he blame – David Peterson and the Chinese for making the knives?

He runs everything like a union, meets with other mayors and does things jointly with his fellow NDP group.

 
JJ
 

I am a big supporter of David Miller for Mayor. I was listening to the debate and I could not decide what Jane Pitfield stands for. She barely debated anything and simply spent the whole night talking about where she thought David Miller had gone wrong and made no real attempt at saying what she planned to do. She even spent her whole opening argument accusing him of not doing a good job. If she thinks that she can do a better job she should have given some examples. She can make all the promises she wants but they’re all empty until she can make an outline of how she’s going to pull it off.
Janna Belcourt
 

It seems to me that Jane Pitfield is bent on comparing every issue to the way it is done in (area code) 905. This is 416, the issues cannot be the same nor can the solutions. Processes that work for 905 communities will not be the same for Toronto. As for Mr. LeDrew, he is obnoxious, abrasive and just likes to hear himself talk.

Lisa Mitchell


I am disappointed with the audience that was chosen at Citytv as their overall opinion (by the clapping at the end) clearly made Jane Pitfield the winner of this debate, when in reality enough credit for Mayor David Miller’s preformance wasn’t given. I believe on election day David Miller will win.

Patricia Duck


Why is Mayor Miller so oppsed to Porter Airlines, when Air Ontario used to fly out of the island?

Andrew Nowack


Over 40% of Torontonians were born outside of Canada and nearly half are visible minorities. None of the major candidates are visible minorities though, so how will each candidate address the issues important to Toronto’s minority population, among others, housing, employment and education?

Jeff Roulston


It is no secret that churches, mosques, and other non-profit faith-based organizations are instrumental as community cornerstones in the enhancement of positive youth-initiatives in the city. In the current environment of youth violence, precipitated largely not only by the influx of firearms, but the reduction of programs in the city particularly for marginalized urban youth, what can the candidates offer regarding support for these organizations as part of a strategy to stem this tide?

Mark Taylor


In the last election David Miller promised to ensure that all city hall contracts go for tender. Why did the street car contract not go out for public tender?
 
Eden Gajraj
 

 
In regard to the debate as a whole, I would suggest that it is not necessary to have the equivalent of a Royal Commission to reach a decision on major issues. Millions of taxpayers dollars end up being spent to research situations which have already been dealt with somewhwere else. With regards to the incineration of municipal waste as an alternative to landfill, Mayor Miller should be aware that Germany and the Scandanavian countries have been doing this for some time without any environmental impact. The secret is in scrubbers which clean the output from the incinerators before dispelling toxins into the environment.
 
He should also be aware that technology exists which can convert municipal waste into energy which can therefore limit the future use of fossil fuels. If council was personally responsible for the decisions it makes regarding the dispositiion of tax payer dollars, I wonder if they would be dispensed as readily without full consideration of the consequences of an error in judgement. What if they were personally financially responsible for their wrong decisions?
 
Iain McLeod

Top Stories

Top Stories

Most Watched Today