Should Voting Be Made Mandatory?
Posted November 3, 2006 12:00 pm.
This article is more than 5 years old.
Or how would you feel if voting was mandatory?
Those are some of the tactics some governments are employing to get people out to the polls. Officials at City Hall may want to think about using some of these methods considering low voter turnout across Toronto.
The numbers in some wards are particularly bad, including Ward 8 – York West, where only 29 percent of eligible voters bothered to exercise their democratic right.
While candidates vying to represent their area of the city have their fellow candidates to worry about, their biggest concern is probably combating voter apathy.
“It’s all the same, it doesn’t matter,” eligible voter Marcello Ostroski said Friday.
Others just don’t care to learn or don’t have the time to find out what each candidate stands for.
“I listen to the news. I see what’s going on, but you don’t know if it’s really what the candidate is about or is it just simply politics,” Charmaine Greenedge said.
While the current voting process is pretty convenient as it is, allowing people to choose their representative from home may boost election numbers. When Internet voting was introduced in Markham in the last election, the city saw a 300 percent increase in advanced polls.
People would probably rush to the polls if the government said it was going to hand out money to voters. It may sound far-fetched but lawmakers in Arizona are considering entering each eligible voter into a lottery where they can win unclaimed lottery winnings.
And there are a number of countries, including Australia and Paraguay, where you can face fines and even jail time if you don’t cast a ballot. (See full list below)
But election officials in Toronto are bent on running the polls the old-fashioned way and have tried to urge people to visit the polls by making them more accessible.
“What we’ve done to encourage greater voter turnout is we have an unprecedented number of voting opportunities prior to Election Day,” City of Toronto spokesman Brad Ross explained.
You can cast your ballot on Nov. 13 and to find out more about advanced polls, click here.
Ward 1 Etobicoke North
Winner: Suzan Hall
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 27,766
Total Votes: 11,222
Ward 2 Etobicoke North
Winner: Rob Ford
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 30,228
Total Votes: 13,352
Ward 3 Etobicoke Centre
Winner: Doug Holyday
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 35,123
Total Votes: 17,241
Ward 4 Etobicoke Centre
Winner: Gloria Lindsay Luby
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 34,471
Total Votes: 18,976
Ward 5 Etobicoke Lakeshore
Winner: Peter Milcyn
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 38,541
Total Votes: 17,818
Ward 6 Etobicoke Lakeshore
Winner: Mark Grimes
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 37,948
Total Votes: 16,464
Ward 7 York West
Winner: Giorgio Mammoliti
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 24,812
Total Votes: Acclaimed
Ward 8 York West
Winner: Peter Li Preti
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 21,760
Total Votes: 8,872
Ward 9 York Centre
Winner: Maria Augimeri
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 25,186
Total Votes: 10,647
Ward 10 York Centre
Winner: Michael Feldman
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 34,027
Total Votes: 13,492
Ward 11 York South Weston
Winner: Frances Nunziata
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 31,737
Total Votes: 12,591
Ward 12 York South Weston
Winner: Frank Di Giorgio
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 28,663
Total Votes: 11,035
Ward 13 Parkdale High Park
Winner: Bill Saundercook
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 33,297
Total Votes: 19,903
Ward 14 Parkdale High Park
Winner: Sylvia Watson
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 27,040
Total Votes: 14,168
Ward 15 Eglinton-Lawrence
Winner: Howard Moscoe
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 34,080
Total Votes: 14,471
Ward 16 Eglinton-Lawrence
Winner: Karen Stintz
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 33,865
Total Votes: 18,889
Ward 17 Davenport
Winner: Cesar Palacio
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 28,779
Total Votes: 11,394
Ward 18 Davenport
Winner: Adam Giambrone
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 24,997
Total Votes: 11,250
Ward 19 Trinity-Spadina
Winner: Joe Pantalone
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 31,023
Total Votes: 13,774
Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina
Winner: Olivia Chow (now an MP)
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 37,433
Total Votes: 17,492
Ward 21 St. Paul’s
Winner: Joe Mihevic
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 29,511
Total Votes: 16,569
Ward 22 St. Paul’s
Winner: Michael Walker
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 37,387
Total Votes: 20,970
Ward 23 Willowdale
Winner: John Filion
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 45,758
Total Votes: 16,593
Ward 24 Willowdale
Winner: David Shiner
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 37,634
Total Votes: Acclaimed
Ward 25 Don Valley West
Winner: Clifford Jenkins
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 36,720
Total Votes: 18,662
Ward 26 Don Valley West
Winner: Jane Pitfield
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 29,427
Total Votes: 15,701
Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Winner: Kyle Rae
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 41,633
Total Votes: 19,971
Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Winner: Pam McConnell
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 28, 011
Total Votes: 16,764
Ward 29 Toronto Danforth
Winner: Case Ootes
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 28,401
Total Votes: 15,039
Ward 30 Toronto Danforth
Winner: Paula Fletcher
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 31,464
Total Votes: 16,372
Ward 31 Beaches-East York
Winner: Janet Davis
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 30,857
Total Votes: 16,504
Ward 32 Beaches-East York
Winner: Sandra Bussin
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 35,381
Total Votes: 19,302
Ward 33 Don Valley East
Winner: Shelley Carroll
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 30, 428
Total Votes: 12,973
Ward 34 Don Valley East
Winner: Denzil Minnan-Wong
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 29,744
Total Votes: 13,800
Ward 35 Scarborough Southwest
Winner: Gerry Altobello
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 29,939
Total Votes: 11,875
Ward 36 Scarborough Southwest
Winner: Brian Ashton
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 31,528
Total Votes: 14,969
Ward 37 Scarborough Centre
Winner: Michael Thompson
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 35,951
Total Votes: 15,494
Ward 38 Scarborough Centre
Winner: Glenn De Baeremaeker
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 33,686
Total Votes: 13,495
Ward 39 Scarborough Agincourt
Winner: Mike Del Grande
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 33,016
Total Votes: 12,197
Ward 40 Scarborough Agincourt
Winner: Norman Kelly
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 32,918
Total Votes: 14,023
Ward 41 Scarborough Rouge River
Winner: Bas Balkissoon
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 39,789
Total Votes: 13,469
Ward 42 Scarborough Rouge River
Winner: Raymond Cho
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 37,799
Total Votes: 11,861
Ward 43 Scarborough East
Winner: David Socknacki
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 29,690
Total Votes: 11,887
Ward 44 Scarborough East
Winner: Gay Cowbourne
Total Number of Eligible Voters (2006): 39,887
Total Votes: 17,118
Here’s a list of some of the countries where the idea of mandatory voting is already at least partly in force and the repercussions of not making your “X”.
Argentina: Fine if no explanation
Australia: Fine if no explanation
Belgium: Fine if no explanation, possible inability to land public sector job
Bolivia: Possible confiscation of wages
Brazil: Fine for not voting
Chile: Fine for not voting; rare imprisonment (Registration is optional, but once you’re registered, you’re expected to vote)
Costa Rica: No set penalty
Cyprus: Fine if no explanation
Dominican Republic: No set penalty
Ecuador: Fine for not voting
Egypt: Fine for not voting; possible imprisonment
Fiji: Fine for not voting; possible imprisonment
France: Fine for not voting
Gabon: Penalty unknown
Greece: Requires explanation if not voting
Guatemala: No set penalty
Honduras: No set penalty
Italy: Possible imprisonment, rarely enforced.
Liechtenstein: Fine if no explanation
Luxembourg: Fine if no explanation
Mexico: No set penalty
Paraguay: Fine for not voting
Peru: Fine, inability to access some public services.
Singapore: Citizens loses right to vote until explanation offered
Switzerland: fine, but only in one canton.
Thailand: Not enforced
Turkey: Fine if no explanation, but not generally enforced
Uruguay: Fine if no explanation, loss of access to some public services
Source: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance