Loading articles...

Resolution to do away with gender identity moves forward at Tory convention

Last Updated Nov 19, 2018 at 7:13 am EST

A resolution calling for the removal of gender identity from Ontario schools was approved for further discussion at the Ontario PC Convention on Saturday.

Policy Resolution R4, which was proposed by failed leadership candidate Tanya Granic Allen, says “gender identity theory” is a “highly controversial, unscientific ‘liberal ideology'” and calls on the Ford government to remove the teaching and promotion of it in schools.

Several other resolutions that were approved on day two of the weekend convention included one to support legislation which would give parents ample notice as to when sex-ed lessons would be taught in schools and offer them the choice to “opt-out.”

Party officials were quick to point out that the resolutions were not binding and will not form any part of party policy until they are formally voted on at the next policy convention.

The move drew swift rebuke from the opposition NDP with Toronto-Centre MPP and Housing and Women’s Issues critic Suze Morrison calling it “an affront to the Human Rights Code.”

“Days away from the Trans Day of Remembrance & Ontario PCs have shown us where they really stand on human rights, once again,” she tweeted. “Trans rights are human rights. Gender is no binary.”

The convention delegates also voted to reject auto insurance reforms which would have made it more affordable while maintaining the level of benefits.

Heading into the convention, prominent social conservatives expressed concerns that their voices were being ignored, once again exposing cracks in a coalition that helped propel the party to a massive election win earlier this year.

Jack Fonseca of the social conservative group Campaign Life Coalition and Granic Allen, a parental rights advocate and former Tory leadership candidate, have both expressed frustration that dozens of policy resolutions with a social conservative bent were blocked from being debated by party members at the event in Etobicoke.

The exclusion of the proposals has rekindled fears amongst some social conservatives that their voices will once again be marginalized, as they said the party had done under former Tory leader Patrick Brown.

“Our take on this is that liberal-progressive elements within the party establishment that are corrupt and against democratic rights of party members have filtered out policy resolutions that were submitted by grassroots members,” Fonseca said, alleging party officials have “rigged” the debate.

Fonseca said the rejected proposals, which run the gamut from denouncing the Liberal sex-education curriculum to protecting so-called conscience rights for physicians, are in some cases actual policies that Premier Doug Ford’s government is currently taking action on.

Fonseca points to one resolution that would affirm support for requiring parental consent in order to grant a minor an abortion. Ford made headlines during his run for the Tory leadership by supporting the idea, at the time expressing his incredulity over other politicians’ fear of addressing the issue.

Fonseca said that resolution won’t be debated this weekend.

“Doug Ford said during the (leadership) campaign that he supported that kind of legislation,” he said. “He ran on that. It helped him.”

Fonesca said Ford himself should intervene and ensure social conservatives have a voice during the policy debate. If the premier doesn’t, he risks damaging the coalition that helped him win the spring vote, Fonseca said.

“It will be seen by social conservatives as a betrayal by the party,” he said. “I seriously believe it would put at risk a second-term majority government for the Ford PCs.”

Granic Allen said a number of policy resolutions she submitted for debate were also rejected by the party.

“The majority of what one would describe as social conservative (policies) … just simply didn’t make it,” she said. “You’ll have to quiz the party as to why. But of course, we’re very sensitive because we’ve seen something similar a year ago when we saw these policies shuffled away at the Patrick Brown convention.”

Granic Allen has had a tumultuous year within the party. After her bid to lead the Tories fell short, she was the only contestant who stood beside Doug Ford the night results of the vote were revealed.

Months later, Ford removed her as a candidate for the party in the spring election after controversial social media messages she posted were made public. Granic Allen said she hasn’t spoken to Ford since then.

But she said many in the party hoped it had turned the page on the internal tensions that existed during Brown’s tenure as leader.

Ontario Infrastructure Minister Monte McNaughton, who has been a voice for social conservatives in the past, said Ford has worked hard to unite the party.

“I think when you look back in history, whether it was Mike Harris, Stephen Harper, Doug Ford, the most successful conservative leaders in our time have been successful in bringing that coalition together,” he said. “Premier Ford, I think, has done a great job as someone who is a fiscal conservative who stands up for families.”

Ford’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Western University political science professor Cristine de Clercy said every political party is a coalition of different factions, so the Tories’ internal struggles are no surprise. But this weekend’s policy convention will be Ford’s first challenge when it comes to reinforcing unity.

“It’s time to pay the piper,” said de Clercy. “Mr. Ford has the difficult task of allocating a still relatively small basket of resources to quite a large demand for reward.”

Wilfrid Laurier political science professor Barry Kay said the divide between social conservatives and progressives in Ontario’s Tories is a “natural cleavage point.” Many previous Tory leaders, including former prime minister Stephen Harper, have pushed social conservatives to the side in a bid to win more mainstream supporters.

“Those are losing positions,” he said of many social conservative core issues. “Harper made a calculation in federal politics that winning was more important than being a purist on social conservative issues.”

Kay said every conservative leader, including Ford, has the advantage of knowing social conservatives won’t park their votes with other parties, even if they are ignored.

“My hunch is that the central PC party people…are just telling him (Ford) to smile at them and try to cajole them a bit — but don’t take them too seriously.”